4.3 Article

Biomechanical force in blood development: Extrinsic physical cues drive pro-hematopoietic signaling

Journal

DIFFERENTIATION
Volume 86, Issue 3, Pages 92-103

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.diff.2013.06.004

Keywords

Hematopoietic stem cells; Hemogenic endothelium; Biomechanical force; Shear stress; Mechanotransduction; Cellular microenvironment

Funding

  1. NIH [1K01DK092365]
  2. American Society of Hematology Scholar Award
  3. State of Texas Emerging Technology Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The hematopoietic system is dynamic during development and in adulthood, undergoing countless spatial and temporal transitions during the course of one's life. Microenvironmental cues in the many unique hematopoietic niches differ, characterized by distinct soluble molecules, membrane-bound factors, and biophysical features that meet the changing needs of the blood system. Research from the last decade has revealed the importance of substrate elasticity and biomechanical force in determination of stem cell fate. Our understanding of the role of these factors in hematopoiesis is still relatively poor; however, the developmental origin of blood cells from the endothelium provides a model for comparison. Many endothelial mechanical sensors and second messenger systems may also determine hematopoietic stem cell fate, self renewal, and homing behaviors. Further, the intimate contact of hematopoietic cells with mechanosensitive cell types, including osteoblasts, endothelial cells, mesenchymal stem cells, and pericytes, places them in close proximity to paracrine signaling downstream of mechanical signals. The objective of this review is to present an overview of the sensors and intracellular signaling pathways activated by mechanical cues and highlight the role of mechanotransductive pathways in hematopoiesis. (c) 2013 International Society of Differentiation. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available