4.3 Article

Developmental effects of tobacco smoke exposure during human embryonic stem cell differentiation are mediated through the transforming growth factor-β superfamily member, Nodal

Journal

DIFFERENTIATION
Volume 83, Issue 4, Pages 169-178

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.diff.2011.12.005

Keywords

Human embryonic stem cell; Differentiation; Mesoderm; MicroRNA; Tobacco; Nicotine

Funding

  1. Connecticut Department of Health
  2. University of Connecticut General Clinical Research Center
  3. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [HL085377, HL007544]
  4. Department of Pediatrics, University California, San Francisco

Ask authors/readers for more resources

While the pathologies associatedwith in utero smoke exposure are well established, theirun derlying molecular mechanisms are incompletely understood. We differentiated human embryonic stem cells in the presence of physiological concentrations of tobacco smoke and nicotine. Using post hoc microarray analysis, quantitative PCR, and immunoblot analysis, we demonstrated that tobacco smoke has lineage- and stage-specific effects on human embryonic stem cell differentiation, through both nicotine- dependentand- independent pathways. Weshowthat three major stem cell pluripotency/ differentiation pathways, Notch, canonical Wnt, and transforming growth factor-beta, are affectedby smoke exposure, and that Nodal signaling through SMAD2 is specifically impacted by effects on Lefty1, Nodal, and FoxH1. These events are associated with upregulation of micro RNA- 302a, apost- transcriptional silencer of Lefty1. The described studies provide insight into theme chanisms by which tobacco smoke influences fetal development at the cellular level, and identify specific transcriptional, post-transcriptional, and signaling pathways by which this likely occurs. (C) 2011 International Society of Differentiation. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available