4.3 Review

The contribution of different cell lineages to bone repair: Exploring a role for muscle stem cells

Journal

DIFFERENTIATION
Volume 77, Issue 1, Pages 12-18

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.diff.2008.09.007

Keywords

Osteoblast; Differentiation; Osteogenesis; Myoblasts; Cell-fate tracking

Funding

  1. Australian Orthopaedic Research Fund (AORF)
  2. National Health & Medical Research Council (NHMRC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An anabolic response driven by osteoblasts is critical for the process of bone healing. Current evidence suggests that these osteoblasts may arise frommultiple tissue types and cell lineages. Stem cells present in the bone marrow, periosteum, local soft tissues, vasculature, and/or circulation have been shown to have osteogenic potential. Transplanted cells from these sources have also been shown to incorporate into induced ectopic bone or repaired bone. While these experiments demonstrate the latent capacity of different lineages to assume an osteoblastic phenotype under pro-osteogenic conditions, the actual contribution of the different lineages to various repair situations in vivo remains unclear. This review explores the data arising from different bone formation and repair models. We propose a model suggesting that cells arising from the local tissues, particularly muscle cells, may play an important role in fracture repair under situations where the periosteal and/or bone marrow progenitor populations are depleted. Crown Copyright (C) 2008 Published by Elsevier Ltd. on behalf of International Society of Differentiation All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available