4.2 Article

A preliminary phylogenetic analysis of the Cymbellales based on 18S rDNA gene sequencing

Journal

DIATOM RESEARCH
Volume 26, Issue 3-4, Pages 305-315

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/0269249X.2011.633255

Keywords

18S rDNA; Bacillariophyceae; Cymbellales; freshwater diatoms; phylogeny

Funding

  1. Centre de Recherche Public-Gabriel Lippmann (Luxembourg)
  2. CEMAGREF (France)
  3. Conseil General des Alpes Maritimes (France)
  4. University of Aveiro of Barcelona, Leon, Vigo (Spain)
  5. University of Evora (Portugal) of Barcelona, Leon, Vigo (Spain)
  6. University of Camerino (Italy)
  7. University of Trento (Italy)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although diatom taxa have been observed and described for many years using light and electron microscopy, several taxa have called for some clarifications and taxonomic reassessments. This is the case for the order Cymbellales D.G. Mann, which is widely represented in freshwater. The phylogenetic relationships among taxa belonging to this order are not always clear because their taxonomic status has been repeatedly revised. In this study, diatom cells were isolated from rivers in Italy, Luxembourg, Portugal and Spain. In total, 21 18S rDNA gene sequences, representing six genera of Cymbellales (Cymbella C. Agardh, Didymosphenia M. Schmidt, Encyonema Kutzing, Gomphoneis Cleve, Gomphonema Ehrenberg and Reimeria Kociolek & Stoermer) were determined. These sequences were analyzed along with other known GenBank diatom 18S rDNA gene sequences. The results indicate that the Cymbellaceae Greville and Gomphonemataceae Kutzing, especially the genus Gomphonema, are paraphyletic, and that the significance of some of the morphological characteristics traditionally used for classification purposes requires a reassessment. These results also demonstrate the importance of a polyphasic approach combining both morphological and molecular data in attempting to improve the taxonomy and classification system of diatoms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available