4.6 Article

Amorphization and graphitization of single-crystal diamond - A transmission electron microscopy study

Journal

DIAMOND AND RELATED MATERIALS
Volume 18, Issue 11, Pages 1353-1359

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.diamond.2009.08.012

Keywords

Ion-implantation; Diamond; Graphitization; Amorphization; Single crystal diamond; Transmission electron microscopy (TEM)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The amorphization and graphitization of single-crystal diamond by ion implantation were explored using transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The effect of ion implantation and annealing on the microstructure was studied in (100) diamond substrates Si(+) implanted at 1 MeV. At a dose of 1 x 10(15) cm(-2) implants done at 77 K showed a damage layer that evolves into amorphous pockets upon annealing at 1350 *C for 24 h whereas room temperature implants (303 K) recovered to the original defect free state upon annealing. Increasing the dose to 7 x 10(15) Si(+)/cm(2) at 303 K created an amorphous-carbon layer 570 +/- 20 nm thick. Using a buried marker layer, it was possible to determine that the swelling associated with the amorphization process was 150 nm. From this it was calculated that the layer while obviously less dense than crystalline diamond was still 15% more dense than graphite. Electron diffraction is consistent with the as-implanted structure consisting of amorphous carbon. Upon annealing, further swelling occurs, and full graphitization is achieved between 1 and 24 h at 1350 degrees C as determined by both the density and electron diffraction analysis. No solid phase epitaxial recrystallization of diamond is observed. The graphite showed a preferred crystal orientation with the (002)g//(022)d. Comparison with Monte Carlo simulations suggests the critical displacement threshold for amorphization of diamond is approximately 6 +/- 2 x 10(22) vacancies/cm(3). (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available