4.3 Article

The association between chemosensitivity and Pgp, GST-π and Topo II expression in gastric cancer

Journal

DIAGNOSTIC PATHOLOGY
Volume 8, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BIOMED CENTRAL LTD
DOI: 10.1186/1746-1596-8-198

Keywords

Gastric cancer; MTT colorimetric assay; Drug sensitivity; Pgp; GST-pi; Topo II

Categories

Funding

  1. General Hospital of Jinan Military Command [2013]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: To investigate the relationship between P-glycoprotein (Pgp), glutathione S-transferase pi (GST-pi) and topoisomerase II (Topo II) expression and human gastric cancer chemoresistance in vitro. Methods: Primary single-cell suspensions were prepared from fresh specimens of primary gastric cancer and exposed to hydroxycamptothecin (HCPT), cisplatin (CDDP), 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), adriamycin (ADM) and mitomycin (MMC) for 48 h. Cell metabolic activity and rate of inhibition were evaluated using tetrazolium (MTT) assay. Pgp, GST-pi and Topo II expression was determined in gastric carcinoma tissue samples using immunohistochemistry. Results: Chemosensitivity of the gastric cancer cells varied; the rates of inhibition of cells exposed to HCPT, CDDP and 5-FU were significantly higher than that of cells exposed to ADM and MMC (p < 0.05). Gastric cancer cells with Pgp expression were resistant to ADM and HCPT (p = 0.008 and p = 0.011, respectively). Cells resistant to 5-FU, CDDP and MMC had significantly higher GST-pi expression (p < 0.05). Topo II expression was significantly lower in cells resistant to HCPT, ADM and MMC (p < 0.05). Pgp and GST-pi expression may contribute to primary resistance of gastric cancer cells to some chemotherapeutic drugs, while Topo II expression may indicate HCPT, ADM and MMC sensitivity. Conclusions: Pgp, GST-pi and Topo II detection and the MTT assay could be used as predictors in chemotherapeutic drug administration and for identifying drug resistance in gastric carcinoma.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available