4.3 Article

Characteristics of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae isolates from Korea

Journal

DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE
Volume 76, Issue 4, Pages 486-490

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2013.04.006

Keywords

NDM-1; ST11; Polymyxins; Tigecycline; Klebsiella pneumoniae

Funding

  1. Korea Medical Institute

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, the characteristics of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) isolates from Korea was investigated. A total of 22 CRE isolates were investigated, and most were identified as Klebsiella pneumoniae (16 isolates). In vitro antimicrobial susceptibility testing, multilocus sequence typing, and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis were performed. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) and carbapenemase genes were detected using gene amplification and sequencing. Efflux pump activity and inactivating mutations in OmpK35/36 were also investigated. Among 22 CRE isolates, only 5 produced metallo-beta-lactamases (3 NDM-1, one VIM-2 and one IMP-1). Four and 2 K. pneumoniae and Serratia marcescens isolates showed resistance to polymyxins, respectively, and 2 CRE isolates (1 K. pneumoniae and C. freundii) were resistant to tigecycline. The prevalent carbapenem resistance mechanism found in K. pneumoniae might be porin defects. The most prevalent clone of carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae was ST11 (56.3%), which is the most frequently identified clone among ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae isolates from Korea. Three NDM-1-producing K. pneumoniae isolates belonged to a single clone (ST340) despite their different antimicrobial susceptibilities. In the present study, the clonal dissemination of carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae isolates (ST11) and NDM-1-producing K. pneumoniae isolates (ST340) was determined. Polymyxin- and tigecycline-resistant CRE isolates were also identified, which limits treatment options for infections causes by these organisms. (c) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available