4.3 Article

Evaluation of VITEK 2, MicroScan, and Phoenix for identification of clinical isolates and reference strains

Journal

DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE
Volume 70, Issue 4, Pages 442-447

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2011.04.013

Keywords

Bacteria; Identification; Equipment; Evaluation studies; Task performance and analysis

Funding

  1. Chosun University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To compare the identification accuracies of VITEK 2 (bioMerieux), MicroScan (Siemens Healthcare), and Phoenix (Becton Dickinson), microbial identification was performed on 160 clinical isolates and 50 reference strains on each of these 3 systems, using the appropriate identification kit provided by each system. Of the 142 clinical isolates that were identified at the species level, VITEK 2, MicroScan, and Phoenix correctly identified 93.7%, 82.4%, and 93.0%, and incorrectly identified 2.1%, 7.0%, and 0%, respectively. In the reference strain tests, VITEK 2, MicroScan, and Phoenix correctly identified 55.3%, 54.4%, and 78.0% of the reference strains at the species level and incorrectly identified 10.6%, 13.0%, and 6.0% of the reference strains, respectively. In conclusion, the identification rate of VITEK 2, Phoenix, and MicroScan was high or acceptable on clinical isolates. Phoenix showed a significantly higher performance than VITEK 2 or MicroScan in identifying the reference strains. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available