4.3 Article

Performance of Binax NOW Flu A and B and direct fluorescent assay in comparison with a composite of viral culture or reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction for detection of influenza infection during the 2006 to 2007 season

Journal

DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE
Volume 62, Issue 2, Pages 162-166

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2007.10.012

Keywords

influenza virus; rapid test; Binax NOW; direct fluorescent assay; sensitivity; specificity

Funding

  1. NCPDCID CDC HHS [1 U01 CI000192-01] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Binax NOW Flu A and Flu B (Binax NOW), direct fluorescent assay (DFA), and viral culture were evaluated and compared with a composite of viral Culture or reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Participants with medically attended acute respiratory illness were identified through active surveillance during the 2006 to 2007 season, and consenting individuals (n = 932) were tested for influenza by Culture and RT-PCR. Physicians ordered a rapid antigen test (Binax NOW [n = 73] or DFA [n = 70]) according to their clinical judgment. The Binax NOW detected 11 of 18 influenza infections (sensitivity, 61%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 36-83%)), whereas DFA detected 17 of 21 influenza infections (sensitivity 81%, 95% Cl, 58-95%). Compared with culture/RT-PCR, specificity of both Binax NOW and DFA was 100%. During the 2006 to 2007 Influenza season, DFA and Binax NOW demonstrated high specificity but failed to identify a substantial proportion Of Influenza infections. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available