4.1 Article

Value of P63 and CK5/6 in Distinguishing Squamous Cell Carcinoma From Adenocarcinoma in Lung Fine-Needle Aspiration Specimens

Journal

DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY
Volume 37, Issue 3, Pages 178-183

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/dc.20975

Keywords

lung; fine-needle; aspiration; immunohistochemistry; TTF-1

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The current FDA-approved standard of care for nonsmall cell lung cancer is Carboplastin/TaxollAvastin based upon an impressive survival benefit: however, patients with squamous carcinoma (SQCC) cannot receive Avastin because of a 30% morality rate due to fatal hemoptysis. In this study we evaluated the role of cytomorphology and immunohistochemistry in differentiating SQCC from adenocarcinoma (ADC) in lung FNA specimens. The case cohort included 53 FNA cases of nonsmall cell lung carcinoma with surgical pathology folow-up. All FNA specimens were reviewed independently by a panel of cytopathologists to differentiate between SQCC and ADC. The cell block material was available in 23 cases (11 ADC and 12 SQCC) to perform immunohistochemical stains for TTF-1 CK7, CK20, P63, and CK516. On surgical resection, 35/53 (66%) for ADC and 53% for SQCC (combined accuracy 60%). By immunohistochemical staining, 14/23 (61%) cases expressed TTF-1. Nine cases were TTF-1 negative; eight of the TTF-1 negative cases (89%) were SQCC. Twenty-three cases expressed CK7 (87%); one ADC case (4%) showed focal CK20 positivity. Both P63 and CK5/6 expression was seen in 9112 (75%) SQCC cases; none of the ADC cases showed this dual expression. Cytomorphology alone may not be able to stratify all cases of nonsmall cell lung carcinoma into ADC and SQCC in FNA specimens. The immune-panel of TTF-1, CK7, CK20, P63, and CK5/6 is useful in differentiating SQCC from ADC. Diagn, cytopathol, 2009;37:178-183 (C) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available