Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.A systematic review of interventions to enhance the healing of chronic ulcers of the foot in diabetes
F. L. Game et al.
DIABETES-METABOLISM RESEARCH AND REVIEWS (2012)
Graphical methods and numerical summaries for presenting results from multiple-treatment meta-analysis: an overview and tutorial
Georgia Salanti et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2011)
GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables
Gordon Guyatt et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2011)
Checking consistency in mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis
S. Dias et al.
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE (2010)
Randomised controlled trial of the use of three dressing preparations in the management of chronic ulceration of the foot in diabetes
W. J. Jeffcoate et al.
HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT (2009)
A systematic review of the effectiveness of interventions to enhance the healing of chronic ulcers of the foot in diabetes
R. J. Hinchliffe et al.
DIABETES-METABOLISM RESEARCH AND REVIEWS (2008)
Prospective randomized controlled study of Hydrofiber® dressing containing ionic silver or calcium alginate dressings in non-ischaemic diabetic foot ulcers
E. B. Jude et al.
DIABETIC MEDICINE (2007)
Guidelines for the treatment of diabetic ulcers
David L. Steed et al.
WOUND REPAIR AND REGENERATION (2006)
Combination of direct and indirect evidence in mixed treatment comparisons
G Lu et al.
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE (2004)
A randomized, controlled trial of promogran (a collagen/oxidized regenerated cellulose dressing) vs standard treatment in the management of diabetic foot ulcers
A Veves et al.
ARCHIVES OF SURGERY (2002)
Sodium carboxyl-methyl-cellulose dressings in the management of deep ulcerations of diabetic foot
A Piaggesi et al.
DIABETIC MEDICINE (2001)
Share Paper
