4.7 Article

Prevalence of diabetes mellitus and impaired glucose regulation in Spain: the Di@bet.es Study

Journal

DIABETOLOGIA
Volume 55, Issue 1, Pages 88-93

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00125-011-2336-9

Keywords

Epidemiology; Prevalence; Spain; Type 2 diabetes mellitus

Funding

  1. CIBER in Diabetes and Associated Metabolic Disorders-CIBER-DEM (ISCIII-Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion), Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo and Spanish Society of Diabetes-SED

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Di@bet.es Study is the first national study in Spain to examine the prevalence of diabetes and impaired glucose regulation. A population-based, cross-sectional, cluster sampling study was carried out, with target population being the entire Spanish population. Five thousand and seventy-two participants in 100 clusters (health centres or the equivalent in each region) were randomly selected with a probability proportional to population size. Participation rate was 55.8%. Study variables were a clinical and demographic structured survey, lifestyle survey, physical examination (weight, height, BMI, waist and hip circumference, blood pressure) and OGTT (75 g). Almost 30% of the study population had some carbohydrate disturbance. The overall prevalence of diabetes mellitus adjusted for age and sex was 13.8% (95% CI 12.8, 14.7%), of which about half had unknown diabetes: 6.0% (95% CI 5.4, 6.7%). The age- and sex-adjusted prevalence rates of isolated impaired fasting glucose (IFG), isolated impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) and combined IFG-IGT were 3.4% (95% CI 2.9, 4.0%), 9.2% (95% CI 8.2, 10.2%) and 2.2% (95% CI 1.7, 2.7%), respectively. The prevalence of diabetes and impaired glucose regulation increased significantly with age (p < 0.0001), and was higher in men than in women (p < 0.001). The Di@bet.es Study shows, for the first time, the prevalence rates of diabetes and impaired glucose regulation in a representative sample of the Spanish population.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available