4.3 Article

Medical and psychological outcomes for young adults with Type 1 diabetes: no improvement despite recent advances in diabetes care

Journal

DIABETIC MEDICINE
Volume 31, Issue 2, Pages 227-231

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/dme.12305

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRC) South Yorkshire
  2. National Institute for Health Research [NF-SI-0611-10248] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

AimTo assess medical and psychological outcomes among young people with Type1 diabetes and to compare medical outcomes with a previous audit. MethodsAn observational study in two diabetes clinics for young adults (aged 16-21years) in Sheffield, UK. Young people (n=96: 81.4% response rate) with Type1 diabetes (diagnosed >6months) completed measures of depressive symptoms, anxiety and disordered eating and consented for their medical records to be consulted. ResultsMean HbA(1c) (8623mmol/mol; 10.02.1%); was comparable with that reported previously and considerably higher than recommended (<58mmol/mol or 7.5%). Screening rates were improved and non-attendance was lower than previously reported, but levels of non-proliferative retinopathy have increased. Microvascular complications are present in 46.9% of those diagnosed more than 7years. Elevated levels of disordered eating were reported by 35.1%. Those scoring above cut-off levels for clinical anxiety (26.6%) and depression (10.9%) are comparable with other work with young people with Type1 diabetes. ConclusionsDespite technological advances and improvements to delivery of care, HbA(1c) remain above recommended levels in a significant proportion of young people, many of whom already have microvascular complications. We need to learn from European centres who achieve better results, improve transition from paediatric care, integrate mental health support with diabetes care provision and take into account young people's views about clinic.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available