4.3 Article

Monotherapy with the once-weekly GLP-1 analogue dulaglutide for 12 weeks in patients with Type 2 diabetes: dose-dependent effects on glycaemic control in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

Journal

DIABETIC MEDICINE
Volume 29, Issue 10, Pages 1260-1267

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2012.03745.x

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Eli Lilly and Company

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Diabet. Med. 29, 12601267 (2012) Abstract Aims Evaluate dose-dependent effects of once-weekly dulaglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue, on glycaemic control in patients with Type 2 diabetes treated with lifestyle measures with or without previous metformin. Methods This 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, doseresponse trial randomized 167 patients who were anti-hyperglycaemic medication-naive or had discontinued metformin monotherapy [mean baseline HbA1c 59 +/- 8 to 61 +/- 8 mmol/mol (7.6 +/- 0.7 to 7.8 +/- 0.8%)] to once-weekly injections of placebo or dulaglutide (0.1, 0.5, 1.0 or 1.5 mg). Results A significant dose-dependent reduction in HbA1c (least squares mean +/- se) was observed across doses (P < 0.001). HbA1c reductions in the 0.5, 1.0 and 1.5 mg dulaglutide groups were greater than in the placebo group [-10 +/- 1, -11 +/- 1 and -11 +/- 1 vs. 0 +/- 1 mmol/mol (-0.9 +/- 0.1, -1.0 +/- 0.1 and -1.0 +/- 0.1 vs. 0.0 +/- 0.1%), respectively, all P < 0.001]. Dose-dependent reductions in fasting plasma glucose were also observed [least squares mean difference (95% CI) ranging from -0.43 (-1.06 to 0.19) mmol/l for dulaglutide 0.1 mg to -1.87 (-2.56 to -1.19) mmol/l for dulaglutide 1.5 mg, P < 0.001]. Dose-dependent weight loss was demonstrated across doses (P = 0.009), but none of the groups were different from placebo. The most common adverse events were nausea and diarrhoea. Conclusions The observed dulaglutide dose-dependent reduction in HbA1c and its acceptable safety profile support further clinical development for treatment of Type 2 diabetes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available