4.3 Article

Examining the effectiveness of a peer-led education programme for Type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease in a Bangladeshi population

Journal

DIABETIC MEDICINE
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages 40-44

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2008.02639.x

Keywords

Bangladeshi; diabetes; peer education; X-PERT (R)

Funding

  1. BUPA Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this study was to assess an adapted version of the X-PERT (R) Programme for Type 2 diabetes within a Bangladeshi population. Bangladeshi adults, living in the UK, with Type 2 diabetes participated in a diabetes educational session based on an adapted version of the X-PERT (R) Programme. Participants attended a session, led by a trained peer educator and carried out in Sylheti. All participants who registered on the course were telephoned or visited in person the day before the course as a reminder. Registration to attend the course was excellent. However, actual attendance rates were 58% (42/72) out of those registered. Once participants attended, overall they enjoyed attending the sessions and felt they benefited as they understood more about how to better self-manage their condition. Those aspects of the sessions that were most enjoyed were group discussions and interactive posters to explain diabetes. Participants requested a home-based exercise guide, which was developed by the research team. The study was underpowered to show behaviour change, but did demonstrate a trend to improvement in self-care activities. All participants reported recommending the course to others. There was an excellent response in terms of registration for the course. However, the time to attend the course appeared to be a barrier to participants. Nevertheless, for those attending the course, responses were very positive. The amended X-PERT (R) Programme could be used as a component of a package to improve outcome and self-management for people with diabetes in the Bangladeshi community. Diabet. Med. 26, 40-44 (2009).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available