Journal
DIABETIC MEDICINE
Volume 27, Issue 1, Pages 117-122Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2009.02887.x
Keywords
calibration; continuous glucose monitoring; Guardian (R) RT; minimal model
Categories
Funding
- JDRF [22-2006-1113, 22-2007-1801]
- EFSD
- NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre
- UK Medical Research Council [1052.00.005]
- Medical Research Council [MC_U105260557, G0600717B] Funding Source: researchfish
- National Institute for Health Research [NF-SI-0508-10274] Funding Source: researchfish
- MRC [MC_U105260557] Funding Source: UKRI
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Aims Using compartment modelling, we assessed the time delay between blood glucose and sensor glucose measured by the Guardian (R) RT continuous glucose monitoring system in young subjects with Type 1 diabetes (T1D). Methods Twelve children and adolescents with T1D treated by continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (male/female 7/5; age 13.1 +/- 4.2 years; body mass index 21.9 +/- 4.3 kg/m(2); mean +/- sd) were studied over 19 h in a Clinical Research Facility. Guardian (R) RT was calibrated every 6 h and sensor glucose measured every 5 min. Reference blood glucose was measured every 15 min using a YSI 2300 STAT Plus Analyser. A population compartment model of sensor glucose-blood glucose kinetics was adopted to estimate the time delay, the calibration scale and the calibration shift. Results The population median of the time delay was 15.8 (interquartile range 15.2, 16.5) min, which was corroborated by correlation analysis between blood glucose and 15-min delayed sensor glucose. The delay has a relatively low intersubject variability, with 95% of individuals predicted to have delays between 10.4 and 24.3 min. Population medians (interquartile range) for the scale and shift are 0.800 (0.777, 0.823) (unitless) and 1.66 (1.47, 1.84) mmol/l, respectively. Conclusions In young subjects with T1D, the total time delay associated with the Guardian (R) RT system was approximately 15 min. This is twice that expected on physiological grounds, suggesting a 5-to 10-min delay because of data processing. Delays above 25 min are rarely to be observed.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available