4.4 Article

Accuracy of Continuous Glucose Monitoring During Exercise in Type 1 Diabetes Pregnancy

Journal

DIABETES TECHNOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages 223-229

Publisher

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/dia.2012.0292

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Diabetes UK [BDA 07/003551]
  2. Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation
  3. Abbott Diabetes Care (Freestyle Navigator CGM and sensors)
  4. Investigator-Initiated Study Program of Animas Corporation (Animas 2020(R) insulin pump)
  5. Medical Research Council Centre for Obesity and Related Metabolic Diseases
  6. National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre
  7. Addenbrooke's Clinical Research Facility (Cambridge, United Kingdom)
  8. Medtronic
  9. Roche
  10. Novo Nordisk
  11. Eli Lilly
  12. Becton Dickinson
  13. MRC [G0600717] Funding Source: UKRI
  14. Diabetes UK [07/0003551] Funding Source: researchfish
  15. Medical Research Council [G0600717, G0600717B] Funding Source: researchfish
  16. National Institute for Health Research [CDF-2013-06-035, PDF/01/036] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Performance of continuous glucose monitors (CGMs) may be lower when glucose levels are changing rapidly, such as occurs during physical activity. Our aim was to evaluate accuracy of a current-generation CGM during moderate-intensity exercise in type 1 diabetes (T1D) pregnancy. Subjects and Methods: As part of a study of 24-h closed-loop insulin delivery in 12 women with T1D (disease duration, 17.6 years; glycosylated hemoglobin, 6.4%) during pregnancy (gestation, 21 weeks), we evaluated the Freestyle Navigator (R) sensor (Abbott Diabetes Care, Alameda, CA) during afternoon (15:00-18:00 h) and morning (09:30-12:30 h) exercise (55 min of brisk walking on a treadmill followed by a 2-h recovery), compared with sedentary conditions (18:00-09:00 h). Plasma (reference) glucose, measured at regular 15-30-min intervals with the YSI Ltd. (Fleet, United Kingdom) model YSI 2300 analyzer, was used to assess CGM performance. Results: Sensor accuracy, as indicated by the larger relative absolute difference (RAD) between paired sensor and reference glucose values, was lower during exercise compared with rest (median RAD, 11.8% vs. 18.4%; P < 0.001). These differences remained significant when correcting for plasma glucose relative rate of change (P < 0.001). Analysis by glucose range showed lower accuracy during hypoglycemia for both sedentary (median RAD, 24.4%) and exercise (median RAD, 32.1%) conditions. Using Clarke error grid analysis, 96% of CGM values were clinically safe under resting conditions compared with only 87% during exercise. Conclusions: Compared with sedentary conditions, accuracy of the Freestyle Navigator CGM was lower during moderate-intensity exercise in pregnant women with T1D. This difference was particularly marked in hypoglycemia and could not be solely explained by the glucose rate of change associated with physical activity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available