4.5 Article

Self-rated diabetes control in a Canadian population with type 2 diabetes: Associations with health behaviours and outcomes

Journal

DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE
Volume 95, Issue 1, Pages 162-168

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2011.10.019

Keywords

Diabetes type 2; Diabetes-control; Self-care; Diabetes complications; Self-report

Funding

  1. Canadian Institute of Health Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims: Diabetes control is a multifaceted process involving successful adherence to a self-care regimen as indicated by improved health outcomes. The aim of this study was to ascertain the construct validity of self-reported diabetes control in a population-based survey. Methods: This study assessed 1848 participants with type 2 diabetes who took part in the Montreal Diabetes Health and Wellbeing Study in Quebec, Canada. Participants were administered the diabetes complications index as well as sociodemographic and health questions. Results: Fair/poor diabetes control was associated with being less likely to check blood glucose weekly, being less likely to drink alcohol, being more likely to report being physically inactive, reporting fair/poor eating habits, being obese and having 1 or more diabetes complications. When all variables were included in a regression model the two variables most strongly associated with poor fair/poor diabetes control were reporting fair/poor eating habits (odds ratio 1.36, 95% CI 1.00-1.85) and having 2 or more diabetes complications (odds ratio 1.60, 95% CI 1.06-2.40). Conclusions: Results from this study indicate that self-rated diabetes control has associations with diabetes-specific self-care behaviours and outcomes, and is a general indicator of self-care and diabetes-related complications in a population-based survey. Crown Copyright (C) 2011 Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available