4.5 Article

High-intensity aerobic training improves endothelium-dependent vasodilation in patients with metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes mellitus

Journal

DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE
Volume 95, Issue 2, Pages 237-245

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2011.09.034

Keywords

Endothelium vasodilation; Physical training; Ultrasound; Metabolic syndrome; Type 2 diabetes mellitus

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The aim of this study is to compare the effect of physical exercise program on the endothelial function of patients with metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Methods: Patients were randomized for high intensity aerobic training (HI: 80% maximum heart rate, n = 10), low intensity aerobic training (LI: 55% of maximum heart rate, n = 10) and control (n = 11). Before and after 6 weeks of training, subjects performed the maximal exercise test and a study of the endothelial function, through a high resolution ultrasound of the brachial artery, which was assessed after reactive hyperemia (endothelium dependent vasodilation) and nitrate administration (endothelium independent vasodilation). Results: A total of 31 patients with metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes mellitus were studied, with mean age of 58 +/- 6 years, The percentage diameter difference of the vessel after hyperemia was significantly higher for the high intensity group (HI before 2.52 +/- 2.85% and after 31.81 +/- 12.21%; LI before 3.23 +/- 3.52% and after 20.61 +/- 7.76%; controls before 3.56 +/- 2.33% and after 2.43 +/- 2.14%; p < 0.05). Conclusions: High intensity aerobic training improved the functional capability and endothelium dependent vasodilator response, but it does not improve the endothelium independent vasodilation in patients with metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes mellitus. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available