4.5 Article

Prevalence of undiagnosed diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular risk factors in Hong Kong professional drivers

Journal

DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE
Volume 96, Issue 1, Pages 60-67

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2011.12.002

Keywords

Undiagnosed DM; Chinese; Professional drivers; Cardiovascular risk factors; Metabolic syndrome

Funding

  1. Board of the Tung Wah Group of Hospitals

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims: To investigate the prevalence of undiagnosed diabetes mellitus (DM) and cardiovascular risk factors among professional drivers in Hong Kong. Methods: Chinese professional drivers with no history of DM were invited to complete a questionnaire on their health status, followed by taking their body measurements, fasting blood glucose (FG) and lipids. 75 g OGTT were performed when FG >= 5.6 to <7.0 mmol/L. Results: Of these 3376 drivers (male 92.6%, mean age 50.9 +/- 7.6 years), the prevalence of undiagnosed DM, prediabetes, and metabolic syndrome was 8.1% (272/3376, 95% CI 7.1-9.0%), 10.0% (337/3376, 95% CI 9.0-11.0%) and 26.8% (904/3376, 95% CI 25.3-28.3%) respectively, while the corresponding WHO Standard Population age-standardized prevalence was 7.8%, 9.0% and 24.7% respectively. Many of them were obese (51.2%), had hypertension (57.0%) and high cholesterol (58.7%), and a third had hypertriglyceridaemia (34.9%) and low HDL-cholesterol (29.3%). Their median working hours were 60.0 (IQR 14) h. Majority had exercise <1 h/week (56.0%) and ate out >= 6 times/week (54.9%). Conclusions: Hong Kong professional drivers have higher prevalence of undiagnosed DM, cardiovascular risk factors and metabolic syndrome than the general population. Therefore, health care measures targeting against them should be taken to prevent and detect DM and cardiovascular diseases. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available