4.5 Article

Differing effect of statins on insulin sensitivity in non-diabetics: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal

DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE
Volume 87, Issue 1, Pages 98-107

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2009.10.008

Keywords

Statin; Insulin sensitivity; Meta-analysis; HOMA; QUICKI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: To determine whether individual statins had differing effects on insulin sensitivity (IS) in patients without pre-existing diabetes mellitus. Methods: A systematic literature search of MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane CENTRAL was conducted through December 2008. Trials were included if they compared pravastatin, atorvastatin, rosuvastatin or simvastatin to placebo/control, excluded patients with diabetes, and reported data on insulin sensitivity/resistance. IS data was pooled and evaluated as standardized mean differences (SMDs) and 95% confidence interval (CI) using a random-effects model. Results: 16 studies (n = 1146) were included, with patients receiving pravastatin in three trials (n = 164), atorvastatin in five trials (n = 315), rosuvastatin in five trials (n = 419), and simvastatin in five trials (n = 369). When pooled as a class, statins had no significant impact on IS as compared with placebo/control [SMD -0.084(95% CI -0.210to0.042);p = 0.19]. Pravastatin was found to significantly improved IS [SMD 0.342 (95% CI 0.032-0.621); p = 0.03], whereas simvastatin significantly worsened IS [SMD -0.321 (95% CI -0.526 to -0.117); p = 0.03]. Conclusions: Statins do not appear to demonstrate a 'class effect' on IS in patients without diabetes. Differences between individual statins likely exist that may partially explain the findings of previously conducted meta-analyses examining the impact of statins on the development of diabetes. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available