4.5 Article

Circulating glycolaldehyde induces oxidative damage in the kidney of rats

Journal

DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE
Volume 89, Issue 3, Pages 262-267

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2010.05.005

Keywords

Diabetic nephropathy; Glycation; Oxidative stress

Funding

  1. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico - CNPq
  2. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior - CAPES
  3. Rede Instituto Brasileiro de Neurociencia (IBN-Net) [01.06.0842-00]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Renal failure is a key pathological issue in diabetic patients. Increased levels of advanced glycation end-products (AGEs) have been associated to diabetic complications, including diabetic nephropathy. Models of AGE-treated animals have been applied to evaluate the effect of such molecules on oxidative parameters involved in the pathogenesis and evolution of diabetes disease. However, little is known about the effect of glycating agents other than glucose. Here we investigate the effect of intravenously administrated glycolaldehyde (GA) on oxidative stress parameters of the kidney. Male Wistar rats received a single injection of GA in different doses (10, 50 or 100 mg/kg) and were sacrificed after 6, 12 or 24 h. Activities of antioxidant enzymes catalase, superoxide dismutase and glyoxalase I were assayed. Damage to proteins and lipids were also assayed. The content of N-epsilon-(carboxymethyl)lysine (CML) was quantified. Glycolaldehyde induced a decrease in the activity of all enzymes studied. Lipoperoxidation and protein carbonylation raised, accompanied by a decrease in sulfhydryl groups. Despite the oxidative stress generated by GA, no change was found in the content of CML, suggesting that accumulation of AGEs in the kidney might occur at later steps in the development of diabetic nephropathy. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available