4.5 Article

Ethnicity, race, and clinically significant macular edema in the Veterans Affairs Diabetes Trial (VADT)

Journal

DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE
Volume 86, Issue 2, Pages 104-110

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2009.08.001

Keywords

Macular edema; Ethnicity; Risk factors

Funding

  1. Department of Veterans Affairs Office of Research and Development
  2. American Diabetes Association
  3. National Eye Institute
  4. Glaxo SmithKline Pharmaceuticals
  5. Novo Nordisk Pharmaceuticals
  6. Sanofi-Aventis Pharmaceuticals
  7. Kos Pharmaceuticals

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To determine risk factors in clinically significant macular edema (CSME) and if increased CSME in minorities is due to ethnicity or other factors in the Veterans Affairs Diabetes Trial (VADT). Methods: CSME prevalence based on 7-field stereo fundus photographs in 1268 patients with type 2 diabetes was related to ethnicity, demographics and biochemistries by univariate and multivariate analyses. Results: Hispanics (H) made up 17.5% and African Americans (AA) 17.7% of the cohort. CSME prevalence was 10%. In univariate analysis, CSME was more prevalent in H, 18%, and AA, 15.6% than in non-Hispanic Whites (NHW), 6.3%, p < 0.01. Univariate regression of CSME associated with younger age, younger onset of diabetes; longer duration; retinopathy severity; and high HbA1c, BP, urine albumin/creatinine, and amputation, all p < 0.01. In multivariate regression, CSME was associated with ethnicity/race (Hispanic White vs. non-ispanic White, OR, (95% CI), 2.30, (1.35-3.92), p < 0.01; African American vs. non-Hispanic White, 2.30, (1.33-4.00), p < 0.01), diastolic BP (1.13 per 5 mm Hg, (1.02-1.23), p = 0.03), amputation (3.0, (1.11-8.13), p = 0.04), and retinopathy severity (similar to 30, (similar to 17 to similar to 59), p < 0.01). Conclusion: The prevalence of CSME in the VADT is associated with ethnicity as well as diastolic BP, amputation, and retinopathy severity. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available