4.5 Article

Variability non creatinine excretion in adult diabetic, overweight men and women: Consequences an creatinine-based classification of renal disease

Journal

DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE
Volume 80, Issue 1, Pages 102-107

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2007.11.006

Keywords

diabetes; obesity; renal insufficiency; creatinine clearance; glomerular filtration rate

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: It is crucial to estimate renal function in diabetic patients. However, formulas are inadequate in this population whereas creatinine clearance (C-cr) on a 24-h urine collection may be valuable only if we can improve its reproducibility. Objective: To evaluate in diabetic patients whether standardised procedures of 24-h urine collection improve the day-to-day variability in creatinine urinary excretion and the subsequent precision of the measured C-cr. Methods: The C-cr from two consecutive 24-h urine collections was measured in 201 consecutive diabetic inpatients. Procedures of 24-h urine collection were standardised, and implementation was supervised at a diabetes clinic. Results: Pearson's correlation coefficients of the two 24-h creatinine urinary excretion were significant (r(2) = 0.64 in women and r(2) = 0.65 in men, p < 0.0001) but the daily variability in creatinine urinary excretion was high (14.9% in women and 17.4% in men). As a consequence, the agreement between the two consecutive measurements of Cc, was poor. First, Bland-Altman plots showed large 95% limits of agreement (-34.3 to 34.6 mL/min//1.73 m(2) in women and -39.0 to 52.0 mL/min/1.73 m(2) in men). Secondly, there was a poor agreement for classifying patients according to the National Kidney Foundation classification > 90, 60-89.9, 30-59.9, and < 30 mL/min/1.73 m(2) (Kappa coefficients = 0.61, 0.42, 0.65, and 0.74, respectively). Conclusions: Despite standardised procedures of 24-h urine collection, day-to-day variability in creatinine urinary excretion in adult diabetic men and women remains important, and may lead to misclassification of renal disease. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available