4.5 Review

Intensification lessons with modern premixes: From clinical trial to clinical practice

Journal

DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE
Volume 81, Issue -, Pages S23-S30

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2008.06.010

Keywords

initiation; intensification; biphasic insulin aspart 30; type 2 diabetes

Funding

  1. Novo Nordisk International Operations

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper aims to underscore the importance of insulin intensification, while highlighting the clinical utility of modem premixes through intensification lessons, by utilising data from key clinical trials, and from the recently published large observational PRESENT Study. insulin intensification is any change made to an initial insulin regimen to improve glycaemic control. Yet, despite established glycaemic targets, current HbA1c levels in insulin-treated patients suggest that 'real-world' insulin regimens are not optimally intensified. When treatment is intensified as needed, patients are more likely to achieve and maintain glycaemic targets, as evidenced by treat-to-target trials utilising forced titration algorithms. Both clinical and observational studies suggest that modem premixes, such as biphasic insulin aspart 30, represent an effective and well-tolerated option when intensifying a number of existing insulin regimens that no longer maintain optimal glycaemic control. However, physician and patient concerns regarding initiation and intensification of insulin therapy can create barriers to effective patient care, and it is essential that such barriers be resolved. Although it is important to encourage patients to initiate insulin therapy when needed, it is equally important that insulin regimens benefit from ongoing intensification in order to maintain glycaemic control as type 2 diabetes follows its typically progressive course. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available