4.7 Article

Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors and cardiovascular risk: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

Journal

DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages 112-120

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/dom.12000

Keywords

cardiac complications; macrovascular disease; oral pharmacological agents

Funding

  1. Bristol Myers Squibb
  2. Merck
  3. Takeda
  4. Astra Zeneca
  5. Novartis A/S
  6. Boehringer Ingelheim
  7. Bristol Myers Squibb/Astra Zeneca
  8. AstraZeneca
  9. Novartis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims Preliminary data from randomized trials with metabolic outcomes have shown that treatment with dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4i) could be associated with a reduced incidence of major cardiovascular events (MACE). The present meta-analysis is aimed at verifying this protective effect, collecting all available data from randomized trials. Methods A comprehensive search for published and unpublished trials with a duration =24 weeks comparing DPP4i with placebo or other drugs was performed, retrieving all MACE reported as serious adverse events together with death from any cause. MantelHaenzel odds ratio (MHOR) was calculated with random effect models for MACE, myocardial infarction, stroke and mortality. When available, effects on glycated haemoglobin, lipid profile and blood pressure were also assessed and used for the estimation of the modification of risk for myocardial infarction using the UKPDS risk engine. Results A total of 70 trials, enrolling 41?959 patients with a mean follow-up of 44.1 weeks, was collected and included in the analysis. The MHOR (95% Confidence Interval) was 0.71[0.59;0.86], 0.64[0.44;0.94], 0.77[0.48;1.24] and 0.60[0.41;0.88] for MACE, myocardial infarction, stroke and mortality, respectively. Conclusions Treatment with DPP4i reduces the risk of cardiovascular events (particularly myocardial infarction) and all-cause mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes. The reduction in the incidence of myocardial infarction is greater than what predicted on the basis of conventional risk factors, suggesting a role for other mechanisms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available