4.7 Review

Causes and cures for endoplasmic reticulum stress in lipotoxic beta-cell dysfunction

Journal

DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM
Volume 12, Issue -, Pages 76-82

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2010.01279.x

Keywords

diabetes; endoplasmic reticulum stress; free fatty acids; islets; lipotoxicity; oleate; palmitate; pancreatic beta-cells; unfolded protein response

Funding

  1. European Union [CEED3]
  2. European Community
  3. European Foundation for the Study of Diabetes
  4. FNRS (Fonds National de la Recherche Scientifique)
  5. FRSM (Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique Medicale), Belgium
  6. CAPES (Brazilian Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pancreatic beta-cell dysfunction is central to the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes, and the loss of functional beta-cell mass in type 2 diabetes is at least in part secondary to increased beta-cell apoptosis. Accumulating evidence suggests that endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress is present in beta-cells in type 2 diabetes. Free fatty acids (FFAs) cause ER stress and are putative mediators of beta-cell dysfunction and death. In this review, we discuss the molecular mechanisms underlying ER stress induced by saturated and unsaturated FFAs. Oleate and palmitate trigger ER stress through ER Ca2+ depletion and build-up of unfolded proteins in the secretory pathway. Saturated and unsaturated FFAs elicit a differential signal transduction in the three branches of the ER stress response, resulting in different survival/apoptosis outcomes. The protection of beta-cells against FFAs through the interference with ER stress signalling has opened novel therapeutic perspectives for type 2 diabetes. Chemical chaperones, salubrinal and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analogues have been used to protect beta-cells from lipotoxic ER stress. Importantly, the pro- and antiapoptotic effects of these compounds are cell and context dependent.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available