4.7 Article

Cardiovascular risk and thiazolidinediones-what do meta-analyses really tell us?

Journal

DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM
Volume 12, Issue 12, Pages 1023-1035

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2010.01262.x

Keywords

cardiovascular disease; myocardial infarction; pioglitazone; rosiglitazone; thiazolidinediones

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Meta-analyses of clinical trials suggest that the use of the thiazolidinedione (TZD), rosiglitazone, in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus may increase the risk of myocardial ischaemic events by 30-40%. Although these controversial data must be interpreted with caution, in the absence of definitive prospective cardiovascular (CV) outcomes data, they represent a prominent source of evidence concerning the CV safety of rosiglitazone. The results of meta-analyses and a large randomized-controlled CV outcomes trial provide strong evidence that pioglitazone does not increase the risk of coronary events. This article clarifies the clinical significance of these meta-analytical findings alongside other sources of evidence and assesses their impact on evolving treatment guidelines and recommendations for the use of TZDs in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available