4.2 Article

Development and validation of an instrument to measure resources and support for chronic illness self-management - A model using diabetes

Journal

DIABETES EDUCATOR
Volume 34, Issue 4, Pages 707-718

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0145721708321021

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose Few comprehensive and practical instruments exist to measure the receipt of self-management support for chronic illness. An instrument was developed to measure resources and support for self-management (RSSM) for the survey component of the evaluation of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation's Diabetes Initiative. It includes items to measure an ecological range of RSSM. This article describes the development and validation of the instrument, focusing on individuals' reported access to RSSM from providers and from nonclinical, social, and community sources. Methods Cross-sectional analyses of the second wave of a survey of participants in the Diabetes Initiative (68% response rate, n = 957) were used. Results Confirmatory factor analyses supported grouping the 17 items into 5 subscales, measuring key aspects of RSSM: individualized assessment, collaborative goal setting, enhancing skills, ongoing follow-up and support, and community resources (comparative fit index = 0.97, Tucker-Lewis fit index = 0.99, and root mean square error of approximation = 0.06). The overall scale and 5 subscales were internally consistent (Cronbach alpha >= .70) and were significantly, positively related to diabetes self-management behaviors, supporting their construct validity. Conclusions This instrument shows promise for measuring RSSM. Although it was developed for diabetes programs, its ecological orientation and link to the broad framework of chronic care suggest broader application.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available