4.7 Article

No Effect of High-Dose Vitamin D Supplementation on Glycemic Status or Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Subjects With Prediabetes

Journal

DIABETES CARE
Volume 37, Issue 8, Pages 2123-2131

Publisher

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/dc14-0218

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. North Norway Regional Health Authority
  2. Norwegian Diabetes Association
  3. University of Tromso
  4. Research Council of Norway
  5. Novo Nordisk Foundation
  6. Novo Nordisk Fonden [NNF12OC1016126] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE In observational studies, low serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D[25(OH)D] concentrations have been associated with insulin resistance and other risk factors for cardiovascular disease. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS We present 1-year data from an ongoing 5-year trial in 511 individuals with impaired fasting glucose (IFG) and/or impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) randomly assigned to 20,000 IU/week vitamin D3 or placebo. An oral glucose tolerance test was performed at baseline and after 1 year. RESULTS Mean baseline serum 25(OH) D was 59.9 nmol/L and 61.1 nmol/L in the vitamin D and placebo groups, respectively, and increased by 45.8 nmol/L and 3.4 nmol/L, respectively. With adjustment for baseline concentrations, no differences in measures of glucose metabolism, insulin secretion or sensitivity, blood pressure, or hs-CRP were found after 1 year. There was a slight, but significant decrease in total and LDL cholesterol in the vitamin D group compared with the placebo group, but as there was also a decrease in HDL cholesterol, the change in the total/HDL cholesterol ratio did not differ significantly. Only analyzing subjects with 25(OH)D <50 nmol/L did not change the results. CONCLUSIONS This study shows that vitamin D supplementation does not improve glycemic indices, blood pressure, or lipid status in subjects with IFG and/or IGT.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available