4.7 Article

Vital Signs, QT Prolongation, and Newly Diagnosed Cardiovascular Disease During Severe Hypoglycemia in Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetic Patients

Journal

DIABETES CARE
Volume 37, Issue 1, Pages 217-225

Publisher

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/dc13-0701

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVETo assess vital signs, QT intervals, and newly diagnosed cardiovascular disease during severe hypoglycemia in diabetic patients.RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODSFrom January 2006 to March 2012, we conducted a retrospective cohort study to assess type 1 and type 2 diabetic patients with severe hypoglycemia at a national center in Japan. Severe hypoglycemia was defined as the presence of any hypoglycemic symptoms that could not be resolved by the patients themselves in prehospital settings.RESULTSA total of 59,602 cases that visited the emergency room by ambulance were screened, and 414 cases of severe hypoglycemia were analyzed. The median (interquartile range) blood glucose levels were not significantly different between the type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) (n = 88) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) (n = 326) groups (32 [24-42] vs. 31 [24-39] mg/dL, P = 0.59). During severe hypoglycemia, the incidences of severe hypertension (180/120 mmHg), hypokalemia (<3.5 mEq/L), and QT prolongation were 19.8 and 38.8% (P = 0.001), 42.4 and 36.3% (P = 0.30), and 50.0 and 59.9% (P = 0.29) in the T1DM and T2DM groups, respectively. Newly diagnosed cardiovascular disease during severe hypoglycemia and death were only observed in the T2DM group (1.5 and 1.8%, respectively). Blood glucose levels between the deceased and surviving patients in the T2DM group were significantly different (18 [14-33] vs. 31 [24-39] mg/dL, P = 0.02).CONCLUSIONST1DM and T2DM patients with severe hypoglycemia experienced many critical problems that could lead to cardiovascular disease, fatal arrhythmia, and death.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available