4.7 Article

Pulmonary Function Reduction in Diabetes With and Without Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Journal

DIABETES CARE
Volume 37, Issue 2, Pages 389-395

Publisher

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/dc13-1435

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [1U01-HL-089897-06A]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVEDiabetes damages major organ systems through disrupted glycemic control and increased inflammation. The effects of diabetes on the lung have been of interest for decades, but the modest reduction in pulmonary function and its nonprogressive nature have limited its investigation. A recent systematic review found that diabetes was associated with reductions in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), and diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide of the lung and increased FEV1/FVC. They reported pooled results including few smokers. This study will examine measures of pulmonary function in participants with extensive smoking exposure.RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODSWe examined pulmonary function in participants with a >10-pack-year history of smoking with and without diabetes with and without chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We measured pulmonary function, exercise capacity, and pulmonary-related quality of life in 10,129 participants in the Genetic Epidemiology of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPDGene) Study.RESULTSParticipants with diabetes were observed to have reduced pulmonary function after controlling for known risk factors and also significant reductions in exercise capacity and quality of life across functional stages of COPD.CONCLUSIONSPulmonary function in patients with 10 pack-years of smoking and diabetes is reduced, and this decrease is associated with significant reductions in activity-related quality of life and exercise capacity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available