4.7 Article

Conduction Slowing in Diabetic Sensorimotor Polyneuropathy

Journal

DIABETES CARE
Volume 36, Issue 11, Pages 3684-3690

Publisher

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/dc13-0746

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Toronto General Hospital/Toronto Western Hospital Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVEMild demyelination may contribute more to the pathophysiology of nerve fiber injury in diabetic sensorimotor polyneuropathy (DSP) than previously thought. We investigated the clinical and electrodiagnostic classifications of nerve injury in diabetic patients to detect evidence of conduction slowing in DSP.RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODSType 1 diabetic subjects (n = 62) and type 2 diabetic subjects (n = 111) with a broad spectrum of DSP underwent clinical examination and nerve conduction studies (NCS). Patients were classified as having axonal (group A), conduction slowing (group D), or combined (group C) DSP based on electrodiagnostic criteria. Patients with chronic immune-mediated neuropathies were not included. The groups were compared using ANOVA, contingency tables, and Kruskal-Wallis analyses.RESULTSOf the 173 type 1 and type 2 diabetic subjects with a mean age of 59.1 13.6 years and hemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)) of 8.0 +/- 1.8% (64 +/- 19.7 mmol/mol), 46% were in group A, 32% were in group D, and 22% were in group C. The severity of DSP increased across groups A, D, and C, respectively, based on clinical and NCS parameters. The mean HbA(1c) for group D subjects (8.9 +/- 2.3% [74 +/- 25.1 mmol/mol]) was higher than for group A and group C subjects (7.7 +/- 1.4% [61 +/- 15.3 mmol/mol] and 7.5 +/- 1.3% [58 +/- 14.2 mmol/mol]; P = 0.003), and this difference was observed in those with type 1 diabetes.CONCLUSIONSThe presence of conduction slowing in patients with suboptimally controlled type 1 diabetes indicates the possibility that this stage of DSP may be amenable to intervention via improved glycemic control.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available