4.7 Article

Diabetic Nephropathy and Microalbuminuria in Pregnant Women With Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Prevalence, antihypertensive strategy, and pregnancy outcome

Journal

DIABETES CARE
Volume 36, Issue 11, Pages 3489-3494

Publisher

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/dc13-1031

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVETo evaluate the prevalence of diabetic nephropathy and microalbuminuria in pregnant women with type 2 diabetes in comparison with type 1 diabetes and to describe pregnancy outcomes in these women following the same antihypertensive protocol.RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODSAmong 220 women with type 2 diabetes and 445 women with type 1 diabetes giving birth from 2007-2012, 41 women had diabetic nephropathy (albumin-creatinine ratio 300 mg/g) or microalbuminuria (albumin-creatinine ratio 30-299 mg/g) in early pregnancy. Antihypertensive therapy was initiated if blood pressure 135/85 mmHg or albumin-creatinine ratio 300 mg/g.RESULTSThe prevalence of diabetic nephropathy was 2.3% (5 of 220) in women with type 2 diabetes and 2.5% (11 of 445) in women with type 1 diabetes (P = 1.00). The figures for microalbuminuria were 4.5 (10 of 220) vs. 3.4% (15 of 445) (P = 0.39). Baseline glycemic control was comparable between women with type 2 diabetes (n = 15) and type 1 diabetes (n = 26). Blood pressure at baseline was median 128 (range 100-164)/81 (68-91) vs. 132 (100-176)/80 (63-100) mmHg (not significant) and antihypertensive therapy in type 2 versus type 1 diabetes was used in 0 and 62%, respectively, at baseline, increasing to 33 and 96%, respectively, in late pregnancy. Pregnancy outcome was comparable regardless type of diabetes; gestational age at delivery: 259 days (221-276) vs. 257 (184-271) (P = 0.19); birth weight 3,304 g (1,278-3,914) vs. 2,850 (370-4,180) (P = 0.67).CONCLUSIONSThe prevalence of diabetic nephropathy and microalbuminuria in early pregnancy was similar in type 2 and type 1 diabetes. Antihypertensive therapy was used more frequently in type 1 diabetes. Pregnancy outcome was comparable regardless type of diabetes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available