4.7 Article

Cohort Study of Insulin Glargine and Risk of Breast, Prostate, and Colorectal Cancer Among Patients With Diabetes

Journal

DIABETES CARE
Volume 36, Issue 12, Pages 3953-3960

Publisher

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/dc13-0140

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Sanofi
  2. UNC-CH
  3. Takeda
  4. Merck
  5. Genentech (Roche)
  6. GlaxoSmithKline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVETo examine whether use of insulin glargine, compared with another long-acting insulin, is associated with risk of breast, prostate, colorectal cancer, or all cancers combined.RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODSComputerized health records from Kaiser Permanente Northern and Southern California regions starting in 2001 and ending in 2009 were used to conduct a population-based cohort study among patients with diabetes aged 18 years. With use of Cox regression modeling, cancer risk in users of insulin glargine (n = 27,418) was compared with cancer risk in users of NPH (n = 100,757).RESULTSThe cohort had a median follow-up of 3.3 years during which there was a median of 1.2 years of glargine use and 1.4 years of NPH use. Among users of NPH at baseline, there was no clear increase in risk of breast, prostate, colorectal, or all cancers combined associated with switching to glargine. Among those initiating insulin, ever use or 2 years of glargine was not associated with increased risk of prostate or colorectal cancer or all cancers combined. Among initiators, the hazard ratio (HR) for breast cancer associated with ever use of glargine was 1.3 (95% CI 1.0-1.8); the HR for breast cancer associated with use of glargine for 2 years was 1.6 or 1.7 depending on whether glargine users had also used NPH.CONCLUSIONSResults of this study should be viewed cautiously, given the relatively short duration of glargine use to date and the large number of potential associations examined.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available