4.7 Article

Personalized Management of Hyperglycemia in Type 2 Diabetes Reflections from a Diabetes Care Editors' Expert Forum

Journal

DIABETES CARE
Volume 36, Issue 6, Pages 1779-1788

Publisher

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/dc13-0512

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Amylin
  2. Elcelyx
  3. Eli Lilly
  4. Sanofi
  5. Valeritas
  6. AstraZeneca
  7. Boehringer Ingelheim
  8. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  9. Daiichi-Sankyo
  10. GlaxoSmithKline
  11. Johnson Johnson
  12. Lexicon
  13. MannKind
  14. Merck
  15. Novartis
  16. Novo Nordisk
  17. Pfizer
  18. Roche
  19. Takeda
  20. AstraZeneca/BMS Collaboration
  21. Janssen/Johnson Johnson
  22. Merck (MSD)
  23. Merck Serono
  24. Roche Pharmaceuticals
  25. Intarcia Therapeutics
  26. Halozyme Therapeutics
  27. Servier
  28. Roche Diagnostics
  29. Bayer
  30. Nestle Nutrition Institute
  31. Janssen

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In June 2012, 13 thought leaders convened in a Diabetes Care Editors' Expert Forum to discuss the concept of personalized medicine in the wake of a recently published American Diabetes Association/European Association for the Study of Diabetes position statement calling for a patient-centered approach to hyperglycemia management in type 2 diabetes. This article, an outgrowth of that forum, offers a clinical translation of the underlying issues that need to be considered for effectively personalizing diabetes care. The medical management of type 2 diabetes has become increasingly complex, and its complications remain a great burden to individual patients and the larger society. The burgeoning armamentarium of pharmacological agents for hyperglycemia management should aid clinicians in providing early treatment to delay or prevent these complications. However, trial evidence is limited for the optimal use of these agents, especially in dual or triple combinations. In the distant future, genotyping and testing for metabolomic markers may help us to better phenotype patients and predict their responses to antihyperglycemic drugs. For now, a personalized (n of 1) approach in which drugs are tested in a trial-and-error manner in each patient may be the most practical strategy for achieving therapeutic targets. Patient-centered care and standardized algorithmic management are conflicting approaches, but they can be made more compatible by recognizing instances in which personalized A1C targets are warranted and clinical circumstances that may call for comanagement by primary care and specialty clinicians.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available