4.7 Article

External Validation of the UKPDS Risk Engine in Incident Type 2 Diabetes: A Need for New Type 2 Diabetes-Specific Risk Equations

Journal

DIABETES CARE
Volume 37, Issue 2, Pages 537-545

Publisher

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/dc13-1159

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Medical Research Council (MRC)
  2. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC)
  3. EPSRC
  4. MRC
  5. NHS
  6. Medical Research Council [1179296] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVETo evaluate the performance of the UK Prospective Diabetes Study Risk Engine (UKPDS-RE) for predicting the 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease end points in an independent cohort of U.K. patients newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes.RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODSThis was a retrospective cohort study using routine health care data collected between April 1998 and October 2011 from approximate to 350 U.K. primary care practices contributing to the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD). Participants comprised 79,966 patients aged between 35 and 85 years (388,269 person-years) with 4,984 cardiovascular events. Four outcomes were evaluated: first diagnosis of coronary heart disease (CHD), stroke, fatal CHD, and fatal stroke.RESULTSAccounting for censoring, the observed versus predicted 10-year event rates were as follows: CHD 6.1 vs. 16.5%, fatal CHD 1.9 vs. 10.1%, stroke 7.0 vs. 10.1%, and fatal stroke 1.7 vs. 1.6%, respectively. The UKPDS-RE showed moderate discrimination for all four outcomes, with the concordance index values ranging from 0.65 to 0.78.CONCLUSIONSThe UKPDS stroke equations showed calibration ranging from poor to moderate; however, the CHD equations showed poor calibration and considerably overestimated CHD risk. There is a need for revised risk equations in type 2 diabetes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available