4.7 Review

Effect of Fructose on Glycemic Control in Diabetes A systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled feeding trials

Journal

DIABETES CARE
Volume 35, Issue 7, Pages 1611-1620

Publisher

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/dc12-0073

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) Knowledge Synthesis
  2. Calorie Control Council
  3. Province of Ontario Postdoctoral Fellowship
  4. Edie Steinberg Scholarship Fund
  5. Edward Christie Stevens Fellowship in Medicin
  6. CIHR Postdoctoral Fellowship Award
  7. CIHR Canada Graduate Scholarship Master's award
  8. Government of Canada through the Canada Research Chair Endowment
  9. CIHR
  10. Canadian Diabetes Association (CDA)
  11. Coca-Cola Company
  12. Archer Daniels Midland
  13. International Life Sciences Institute (ILSI) North America
  14. International Life Sciences Institute (ILSI) Brazil
  15. Abbott Laboratories
  16. Pulse Canada
  17. CDA
  18. Dairy Farmers of Canada
  19. McCain Foods
  20. Temasek Polytechnic
  21. Northwestern University
  22. Royal Society of London
  23. Glycemic Index Symbol program
  24. CreaNutrition AG
  25. McMaster University
  26. Canadian Society for Nutritional Sciences
  27. National Sports and Conditioning Association
  28. Faculty of Public Health and Nutrition, Autonomous University of Nuevo Leon
  29. Diabetes and Nutrition Study Group of The European Association for the Study of Diabetes
  30. Advanced Food Materials Network
  31. Almond Board of California
  32. American Peanut Council
  33. American Pistachio Growers
  34. Barilla
  35. California Strawberry Commission
  36. Canola Council of Canada
  37. Danone
  38. General Mills
  39. Hain Celestial
  40. International Tree Nut Council
  41. Kellogg
  42. Loblaw Brands Ltd
  43. Oldways
  44. Orafti
  45. Paramount Farms
  46. Saskatchewan Pulse Growers
  47. Solae
  48. Unilever
  49. Canadian Foundation for Innovation (CFI)
  50. Ontario Research Fund (ORE)
  51. Advanced Foods and Material Network (AFMNet)
  52. Loblaws Supermarkets, Inc.
  53. Sanitarium Company
  54. Herbalife International
  55. Pacific Health Laboratories, Inc.
  56. Metagenics/MetaProteomics
  57. Bayer Consumer Care
  58. Oldways Preservation Trust
  59. International Tree Nut Council Nutrition Research Education
  60. Peanut Institute
  61. Procter & Gamble Technical Centres Limited
  62. Griffin Hospital for the development of the NuVal System
  63. Soy Advisory Board of Dean Foods
  64. Alpro Soy Foundation
  65. Nutritional Fundamentals for Health
  66. Pacific Health Laboratories
  67. Kellogg's
  68. Quaker Oats
  69. Coca-Cola Sugar Advisory Board
  70. Pepsi Company
  71. Agrifoods and Agriculture Canada (AAFC)
  72. Canadian Agriculture Policy Institute (CAPI)
  73. Canola and Flax Councils of Canada

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE-The effect of fructose on cardiometabolic risk in humans is controversial. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled feeding trials to clarify the effect of fructose on glycemic control in individuals with diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS-We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library (through 22 March 2012) for relevant trials lasting >= 7 days. Data were aggregated by the generic inverse variance method (random-effects models) and expressed as mean difference (MD) for fasting glucose and insulin and standardized MD (SMD) with 95% Cl for glycated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)) and glycatecl albumin. Heterogeneity was assessed by the Cochran Q statistic and quantified by the I-2 statistic. Trial quality was assessed by the Heyland methodological quality score (MQS). RESULTS-Eighteen trials (n = 209) met the eligibility criteria. Isocaloric exchange of fructose for carbohydrate reduced glycated blood proteins (SMD -0.25 [95% Cl -0.46 to -0.04]; P = 0.02) with significant intertrial heterogeneity (I-2 = 63%; P = 0.001). This reduction is equivalent to a similar to 0.53% reduction in HbA(1c). Fructose consumption did not significantly affect fasting glucose or insulin. A priori subgroup analyses showed no evidence of effect modification on any end point. CONCLUSIONS-Isocaloric exchange of fructose for other carbohydrate improves long-term glycemic control, as assessed by glycated blood proteins, without affecting insulin in people with diabetes. Generalizability may be limited because most of the trials were <12 weeks and had relatively low MQS (<8). To confirm these findings, larger and longer fructose feeding trials assessing both possible glycemic benefit and adverse metabolic effects are required. Diabetes Care 35:1611-1620, 2012

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available