4.7 Article

Administration of CD4+CD25highCD127- Regulatory T Cells Preserves β-Cell Function in Type 1 Diabetes in Children

Journal

DIABETES CARE
Volume 35, Issue 9, Pages 1817-1820

Publisher

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/dc12-0038

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Polish Ministry of Science [NN402-3530-38, NR13-0126-10]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE-Type 1 diabetes is a condition in which pancreatic islets are destroyed by self-reactive T cells. The process is facilitated by deficits in the number and suppressive activity of regulatory T cells (Tregs). Here, we show for the first time that the infusion of autologous Tregs prolongs remission in recently diagnosed type 1 diabetes in children. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS-We have administered Tregs in 10 type 1 diabetic children (aged 8-16 years) within 2 months since diagnosis. In total, 4 patients received 10 X 10(6) Tregs/kg body wt, and the remaining 6 patients received 20 X 10(6) Tregs/kg body wt. The preparation consisted of sorted autologous CD3(+)CD4(+)CD25(high)CD127(-) Tregs expanded under good manufacturing practice conditions. RESULTS-No toxicity of the therapy was noted. A significant increase in the percentage of Tregs in the peripheral blood has been observed since the day of infusion. These patients were followed along with matched type 1 diabetic patients not treated with Tregs. Half a year after type 1 diabetes onset (4-5 months after Tregs infusion), 8 patients treated with Tregs still required <0.5 UI/kg body wt of insulin daily, with 2 patients out of insulin completely, whereas the remission was over in the nontreated group. In addition, plasma C-peptide levels were significantly higher in the treated group as compared with those not treated. CONCLUSIONS-This study shows that the administration of Tregs is safe and tolerable in children with recent-onset type 1 diabetes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available