4.7 Article

A Randomized, Controlled Study of Once-Daily LY2605541, a Novel Long-Acting Basal Insulin, Versus Insulin Glargine in Basal Insulin-Treated Patients With Type 2 Diabetes

Journal

DIABETES CARE
Volume 35, Issue 11, Pages 2140-2147

Publisher

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/dc12-0060

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Eli Lilly and Company
  2. Abbott Diabetes Care
  3. Amylin Pharmaceuticals
  4. Bayer HealthCare
  5. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals
  6. Calibra Medical
  7. Dexcom
  8. Halozyme Therapeutics
  9. Helmsley Trust
  10. Hygieia
  11. Intarcia Therapeutics
  12. Johnson Johnson
  13. MannKind Corporation
  14. Medtronic
  15. National Institutes of Health
  16. ResMed
  17. Roche Pharmaceuticals
  18. sanofi-aventis
  19. Takeda Pharmaceutical Company
  20. Becton
  21. Dickinson and Company
  22. Merck Co
  23. Pfizer
  24. Novo Nordisk
  25. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
  26. Forest Laboratories
  27. GlaxoSmithKline
  28. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
  29. AstraZeneca LP
  30. Daiichi-Sankyo
  31. Lexicon Pharmaceuticals
  32. Reata Pharmaceuticals

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE-To evaluate whether LY2605541 results in lower fasting blood glucose (FBG) versus insulin glargine (GL). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS-This 12-week, randomized, open-label, Phase 2 study enrolled patients with type 2 diabetes (hemoglobin A(1c) [A1C] <= 10.5%), taking metformin and/or sulfonylurea with GL or NPH insulin once daily. Patients converted to morning insulin administration during lead-in were randomized 2:1 from GL (n = 248) or NPH insulin (n = 39) to LY2605541 (n = 195) or GL (n = 95) once daily in the morning. RESULTS-At 12 weeks, FBG (mean +/- SE) was similar with LY2605541 and GL (118.2 +/- 2.0 mg/dL [6.6 +/- 0.1 mmol/L] vs. 116.9 +/- 2.7 mg/dL [6.5 +/- 0.2 mmol/L], P = 0.433) as was A1C (7.0 +/- 0.1 vs. 7.2 +/- 0.1%, P = 0.279). Intraday blood glucose variability was reduced with LY2605541 (34.4 vs. 39.1 mg/dL [1.9 vs. 2.2 mmol/L], P = 0.031). LY2605541 patients had weight loss (-0.6 +/- 0.2 kg, P = 0.007), whereas GL patients gained weight (0.3 +/- 0.2 kg, P = 0.662; treatment difference: -0.8 kg, P = 0.001). The incidence and rate of both total hypoglycemia and nocturnal hypoglycemia were comparable between LY2605541 and GL, although, LY2605541 had a 48% reduction in nocturnal hypoglycemia after adjusting for baseline hypoglycemia (P = 0.021). Adverse events were similar across treatments. Alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase remained within normal range but were significantly higher with LY2605541 (P <= 0.001). CONCLUSIONS-In patients with type 2 diabetes, LY2605541 and GL had comparable glucose control and total hypoglycemia rates, but LY2605541 showed reduced intraday variability, lower nocturnal hypoglycemia, and weight loss relative to GL. Diabetes Care 35:2140-2147,2012

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available