4.7 Article

Effect of Continuous Glucose Monitoring on Hypoglycemia in Type 1 Diabetes

Journal

DIABETES CARE
Volume 34, Issue 4, Pages 795-800

Publisher

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/dc10-1989

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Abbott Diabetes Care
  2. Slovenian National Research Agency [J3-9663, J3-2412, P3-0343]
  3. Abbott
  4. Medtronic
  5. Novo Nordisk
  6. Diamyd

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE-To assess the impact of continuous glucose monitoring on hypoglycemia in people with type 1 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS-In this randomized, controlled, multicenter study, 120 children and adults on intensive therapy for type 1 diabetes and a screening level of glycated hemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)) <7.5% were randomly assigned to a control group performing conventional home monitoring with a blood glucose meter and wearing a masked continuous glucose monitor every second week for five days or to a group with real-time continuous glucose monitoring. The primary outcome was the time spent in hypoglycemia (interstitial glucose concentration <63 mg/dL) over a period of 26 weeks. Analysis was by intention to treat for all randomized patients. RESULTS-The time per day vent in hypoglycemia was significantly shorter in the continuous monitoring group than in the control group (mean +/- SD 0.48 +/- 0.57 and 0.97 +/- 1.55 h/day, respectively; ratio of means 0.49; 95% CI 0.26-0.76; P = 0.03), HbA(1c) at 26 weeks was lower in the continuous monitoring group than in the control group (difference -0.27%; 95% CI - 0.47 to -0.07; P = 0.008). Time spent in 70 to 180 mg/dL normoglycemia was significantly longer in the continuous glucose monitoring group compared with the control group (mean hours per day, 17.6 vs. 16.0, P = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS-Continuous glucose monitoring was associated with reduced time spent in hypoglycemia and a concomitant decrease in HbA(1c), in children and adults with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 34:795-800, 2011

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available