4.7 Article

Urinary Markers of Nucleic Acid Oxidation and Long-Term Mortality of Newly Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetic Patients

Journal

DIABETES CARE
Volume 34, Issue 12, Pages 2594-2596

Publisher

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/dc11-1620

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Research Committee at Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet (Rigshospitalets Forskningsudvalg)
  2. Danish Medical Research Council
  3. Aase and Ejnar Danielsen Foundation
  4. P. Carl Petersen Foundation
  5. Augustinus Foundation
  6. Lundbeck Foundation
  7. Danish Research Foundation for General Practice
  8. Health Insurance Foundation
  9. Danish Ministry of Health
  10. Novo Nordisk Farmaka Denmark Ltd.
  11. A.P. Moller Foundation for the Advancement of Medical Science
  12. Pharmacy Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE-We analyzed data from a cohort of 1,381 newly diagnosed type 2 diabetic patients to test the hypothesis that urinary markers of nucleic acid oxidation are independent predictors of mortality. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS-We examined the relationship between urinary excretion of markers of DNA oxidation (8-oxo-7,8-dihydro-2'-deoxyguanosine [8-oxodG]) and RNA oxidation (8-oxo-7,8-dihydroguanosine [8-oxoGuol) and long-term mortality using Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS-After multivariate adjustment, the hazard ratios for all-cause and diabetes-related mortality of patients with 8-oxoGuo levels in the highest quartile compared with those in the lowest quartile were 1.44(1.12-1.85) and 1.54(1.13-2.10), respectively. Conversely, no significant associations between 8-oxodG and mortality were found in the adjusted analyses. CONCLUSIONS-Urinary excretion of the RNA oxidation marker 8-oxoGuo measured shortly after diagnosis of type 2 diabetes predicts long-term mortality independently of conventional risk factors. This finding suggests that 8-oxoGuo could serve as a new clinical biomarker in diabetes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available