4.7 Article

Exenatide Twice Daily Versus Premixed Insulin Aspart 70/30 in Metformin-Treated Patients With Type 2 Diabetes A randomized 26-week study on glycemic control and hypoglycemia

Journal

DIABETES CARE
Volume 34, Issue 3, Pages 604-606

Publisher

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/dc10-1900

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE-Hypoglycemia causes recurrent morbidity in patients with type 2 diabetes. This study evaluated if exenatide twice daily (BID) was noninferior to premixed insulin aspart 70/30 BID (PIA) for glycemic control and associated with less hypoglycemia. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS-In this open-label study, metformin-treated adults with type 2 diabetes were randomized to 26-week treatment with exenatide BID (4 weeks 5 mu g, then 10 mu g) or PIA. RESULTS-Exenatide BID (n = 181) was noninferior to PIA (n = 173) for A1C control (least squares [LS] mean change -1.0 vs. -1.14%; difference [95% CI] 0.14 [-0.003 to 0.291]) and associated with a lower risk for hypoglycemia (8.0 vs. 20.5%, P < 0.05). LS mean weight decreased by 4.1 kg and increased by 1.0 kg with PIA (P < 0.001). A total of 39.2 vs. 20.8% of patients reached the composite end point of A1C < 7.0%, no weight gain, and no hypoglycemia (P < 0.001; post hoc analysis). CONCLUSIONS-In metformin-treated patients, exenatide BID was noninferior to PIA for glycemic control but superior for hypoglycemia and weight control.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available