4.7 Article

Corneal Confocal Microscopy A novel noninvasive test to diagnose and stratify the severity of human diabetic neuropathy

Journal

DIABETES CARE
Volume 33, Issue 8, Pages 1792-1797

Publisher

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/dc10-0253

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation International [5-2002-185]
  2. National Eye Institute [1-R01-NS46259-01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE The accurate quantification of human diabetic neuropathy is important to define at-risk patients, anticipate deterioration, and assess new therapies. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS A total of 101 diabetic patients and 17 age-matched control subjects underwent neurological evaluation, neurophysiology tests, quantitative sensory testing, and evaluation of corneal sensation and corneal nerve morphology using corneal confocal microscopy (CCM). RESULTS Corneal sensation decreased significantly (P = 0.0001) with increasing neuropathic severity and correlated with the neuropathy disability score (NDS) (r = 0.441, P < 0.0001). Corneal nerve fiber density (NFD) (P < 0.0001), nerve fiber length (NFL), (P < 0.0001), and nerve branch density (NBD) (P < 0.0001) decreased significantly with increasing neuropathic severity and correlated with NDS (NFD r = 0.475, P < 0.0001; NBD r = 0.511, P < 0.0001; and NFL r = 0.581, P < 0.0001). NBD and NFL demonstrated a significant and progressive reduction with worsening heat pain thresholds (P = 0.01). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis for the diagnosis of neuropathy (NDS >3) defined an NFD of <27.8/mm(2) with a sensitivity of 0.82 (95% CI 0.68-0.92) and specificity of 0.52 (0.40-0.64) and for detecting patients at risk of foot ulceration (NDS >6) defined a NFD cutoff of <20.8/mm(2) with a sensitivity of 0.71 (0.42-0.92) and specificity of 0.64 (0.54-0.74). CONCLUSIONS CCM is a noninvasive clinical technique that may be used to detect early nerve damage and stratify diabetic patients with increasing neuropathic severity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available