4.7 Article

Fewer Major Amputations Among Individuals With Diabetes in Finland in 1997-2007 A population-based study

Journal

DIABETES CARE
Volume 33, Issue 12, Pages 2598-2603

Publisher

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/dc10-0462

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE - Complications occur in diabetes despite rigorous efforts to control risk factors Since 2000 the National Development Programme for the Prevention and Care of Diabetes has worked to halve the incidence of amputations in 10 years Here we evaluate the impact of the efforts undertaken by analyzing the major amputations done in 1997-2007 RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - All individuals with diabetes (n = 396 317) were identified from comprehensive national databases Data on the first major amputations (n = 9 481) performed for diabetic and nondiabetic individuals were obtained from the National Hospital Discharge Register RESULTS - The relative risk for the first major amputation was 7 4(95% CI 7 2-7 7) among the diabetic versus the nondiabetic population The standardized incidence of the first major amputation decreased among the diabetic and nondiabetic populations (48 8 and 25 2% relative risk reduction respectively) over 11 years, and the time from the registration of diabetes to the first major amputation was significantly longer on average 1 2 years more The cumulative five-year postamputation mortality among diabetic individuals was 78 7% CONCLUSIONS - In our nationwide diabetes database the duration from the registration of diabetes to the first major amputation increased and the incidence of major amputations decreased almost 50% in 11 years Approximately half of this change was due to the increasing size of the diabetic population The risk for major amputation is more than sevenfold that among the nondiabetic population These results pose a continuous challenge to improve diabetes care

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available