4.7 Article

Sagittal Abdominal Diameter Is a Strong Anthropometric Measure of Visceral Adipose Tissue in the Asian General Population

Journal

DIABETES CARE
Volume 33, Issue 12, Pages 2665-2670

Publisher

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/dc10-0606

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Seoul National University Hospital Gangnam Healthcare Center

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE - Finding the anthropometric measure of visceral obesity is essential to clinical practice because it predicts cardiovascular and metabolic risks Sagittal abdominal diameter (SAD) has been proposed as an estimate of visceral adipose tissue (VAT) The aim of the present study was to evaluate the usefulness of SAD in predicting visceral obesity by comparing SAD to other anthropometric measures RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - Estimation of subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue and measurement of SAD and transverse abdominal diameter using computed tomography at the umbilical level were obtained in 5 257 men and women who were enrolled in a health checkup program in Korea To compare Si D to other anthropometric measures linear regression analyses were used to determine correlations between anthropometrics and visceral obesity RESULTS - SAD showed a stronger correlation to VAT than waist circumference BMI and transverse abdominal diameter in the both sexes (men r = 0 804 women r = 0 724) Waist circumference showed generally stronger associations to subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) than to VAT (men r = 0 789 vs 0 705 women r = 0 820 vs 0 636) Even after subdividing according to age or BMI in both sexes and analyzing multiple regressions SAD showed the strongest correlation to VAT CONCLUSIONS - SAD showed the strongest correlation to VAT irrespective of age sex and the degree of obesity compared with other anthropometric measures whereas waist circumference may have a stronger correlation to SAT than to VAT The clinical use of SAD has advantages over other anthropometric measures in predicting VAT

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available