4.7 Article

Etanercept Treatment in Children With New-Onset Type 1 Diabetes Pilot randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study

Journal

DIABETES CARE
Volume 32, Issue 7, Pages 1244-1249

Publisher

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/dc09-0054

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Immunex/Amgen

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE - To gather preliminary data on the feasibility and efficacy of etanercept therapy to prolong endogenous insulin production in pediatric patients with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - This was a 24-week double-blind randomized, placebo-controlled study conducted at the Diabetes Center, Women and Children's Hospital of Buffalo. Eighteen subjects (11 male and 7 female, aged 7.8-18.2 years) were randomly assigned to receive either placebo or etanercept. Inclusion criteria included age 3-18 years, GAD-65 and/or islet cell antibody positivity, A1C >6%, three insulin injections per day, white blood cell count 3,000-10,000, platelets >100,000, and normal liver and renal function. Intention-to-treat analysis was used. RESULTS - A1C at week 24 was lower in the etanercept group (5.91 +/- 0.5%) compared with that in the placebo group (6.98 +/- 1.2%; P < 0.05) with a higher percent decrease from baseline than in the placebo group (etanercept 0.41 +/- 0.1 vs. placebo 0.18 +/- 0.21; P < 0.01). The percent change in C-peptide area under the curve from baseline to week 24 showed a 39% increase in the etanercept group and a 20% decrease in the placebo group (P < 0.05). From baseline to week 24 insulin dose decreased 18% in the etanercept. group compared with a 23% increase in the placebo group (P < 0.05). Seventeen patients completed the study, and none withdrew because of adverse events. CONCLUSIONS - In this small pilot study, treatment of pediatric patients newly diagnosed with type 1 diabetes with etanercept resulted in lower A1C and increased endogenous insulin production, suggesting preservation of P-cell function. A larger study is needed to further explore safety and efficacy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available