4.7 Article

Trends of Earlier and Later Responses of C-peptide to Oral Glucose Challenges With Progression to Type 1 Diabetes in Diabetes Prevention Trial-Type 1 Participants

Journal

DIABETES CARE
Volume 33, Issue 3, Pages 620-625

Publisher

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/dc09-1770

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [UC4 DK117009, U01 DK061034] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE - We studied the C-peptide response to oral glucose with progression to type I diabetes in Diabetes Prevention Trial-Type 1 (DPT-1) participants. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - Among 504 DPT-1 participants <15 years of age, longitudinal analyses were performed in 36 progressors and 80 nonprogressors. Progressors had oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTTs) at baseline and every 6 months from 2.0 to 0.5 years before diagnosis; nonprogressors had OGTTs over similar intervals before their last Visit. Sixty-six progressors and 192 nonprogressors were also studied proximal to and at diagnosis. RESULTS - The 30-0 min C-peptide difference from OGTTs performed 2.0 years before diagnosis in progressors was lower than the 30-0 min C-peptide difference from OGTTs performed 2.0 years before the last visit in nonprogressors(P < 0.01) and remained lower overtime. The 90-60 min C-peptide difference was positive at every OGTT before diagnosis in progressors, whereas it was negative at every OGTT before the last Visit in nonprogressors (P < 0.01 at 2.0 years). The percentage whose peak C-peptide occurred at 120 min was higher in progressors at 2.0 years (P < 0.05); this persisted over time (P < 0.001 at 0.5 years). However, the peak C-peptide levels were only significantly lower at 0.5 years in progressors (P < 0.01). The timing of the peak C-peptide predicted type 1 diabetes (P < 0.001); peak C-peptide levels were less predictive (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS - A decreased early C-peptide response to oral glucose and an increased later response occur at least 2 years before the diagnosis of type 1 diabetes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available