4.7 Article

Long-term effects on medical costs of improving depression outcomes in patients with depression and diabetes

Journal

DIABETES CARE
Volume 31, Issue 6, Pages 1155-1159

Publisher

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/dc08-0032

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIMH NIH HHS [K24 MH069741, K24 MH069471, MH41739, R01 MH041739, K08 MH069741] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE - The purpose of this study was to examine the 5-year effects on total health care costs of the Pathways depression intervention program for patients with diabetes and comorbid depression compared with usual primary care. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - The Pathways Study was conducted in nine primary care practices of a large HMO and enrolled 329 patients with diabetes and comorbid major depression. The current study analyzed the differences in long-term medical costs between intervention and usual care patients. Participants were randomly assigned to a nurse depression intervention (n = 164) or to usual primary care (n = 165). The intervention included education about depression, behavioral activation, and a choice of either starting with support of antidepressant medication treatment by the primary care doctor or problem-solving therapy in primary care. Interventions were provided for up to 12 months, and the main outcome measures are health costs over a 5-year period. RESULTS - Patients in the intervention arm of the study had improved depression outcomes and trends for reduced 5-year mean total medical costs of - $3,907 (95% CI - $15,454 less to $7,640 more) compared with usual care patients. A sensitivity analysis found that these cost differences were largely explained by the patients with depression and the most severe meical comorbidity. CONCLUSIONS - The Pathways depression collaborative care program improved depression outcomes compared with usual care with no evidence of greater long-term costs and with trends for reduced costs among the more severely medically ill patients with diabetes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available