4.7 Article

Timing Is Everything: Age of Onset Influences Long-Term Retinopathy Risk in Type 2 Diabetes, Independent of Traditional Risk Factors

Journal

DIABETES CARE
Volume 31, Issue 10, Pages 1985-1990

Publisher

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/dc08-0580

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE - To test the hypothesis that age of type 2 diabetes onset influences inherent susceptibility to diabetic retinopathy, independent of disease duration and degree of hyperglycemia. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - Retinopathy data from 624 patients with a type 2 diabetes duration of 20-30 years (group A) were analyzed by Stratifying patients according to age of onset of diabetes and glycemic control. Retinopathy status was scored clinically as per a modified Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) severity scale. To obviate possible bias due to a higher attrition from comorbidities in those with later-onset diabetes and retinopathy, 852 patients with type 2 diabetes of shorter duration (10-12 years, group B) were similarly studied. RESULTS - Prevalence and severity of retinopathy was significantly higher in the younger-onset, group A patients. When further stratified according to mean A1C, retinopathy risk remained increased in younger-onset patients. The greatest impact was seen in those With a mean A1C > 9% (odds ratio [OR] for retinopathy 16.6, 7.5, and 2.7 for age of diagnosis < 45, 45-55, and > 55 years, respectively, P = 0.003). By logistic regression, earlier type 2 diabetes onset IS associated With increased retinopathy risk, independent Of traditional risk factors (OR of retinopathy 1.9, 1.1, and 1 for age of onset not greater than 45, 45-55, and > 55 years, respectively). Similar results were found in group B patients. CONCLUSIONS - These data suggest an increased inherent susceptibility to diabetic retinopathy with earlier-onset type 2 diabetes. This further supports the importance of delaying development of diabetes and also implies a need for more stringent metabolic targets for younger individuals.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available